I am working over on www.Lyndamac.com

I am so sorry  have not had time to run this blog or keep up with the comments an the You Tube accounts either there is only so much time in a day. Then there is twitter Lyndamc64 follow me on there if you want a quick reply leave a message . I also did not expect to get comments to be honest with you .I thought it was just a fact that I was the  odd mother who was being very  difficult and simply wanted  to address  the problem  with complaints about the system having lost my case in 2005 . These  complaints  are mostly to do with in it to bin it solicitors who say they are representing parents . I would guess it would take you 2 -3 years to even get through this complaints system which is so  important to be dealt with when working with certain professionals. The so called experts  who are ruling  the courts and destroying families lives . Yes I agree it is a mammoth task for an ordinary parent to navigate the complaints system in an effort to show the  the level of maladministration going on.

The parents coming trough the system now are picking up so quick what we have to say about firms of solicitors…..

I am so busy with the  campaign for adopted children to find a stem cell donor , it seems to be a full time occupation of communicating and sharing information with other families wanting to know how they got hoodwinked into believing we had a fair and honest system . These families now want to leave a genetic key for their lost or stolen children in long term care ,or who had been fast tracked for adoption.

I am mostly working on www.Lyndamac.com  so catch up with me on there if you need an urgent response. Otherwise visit Justiceforfamiliesforum  John Hemming MP for Birmingham.

Guidelines for use of 91/14

IRELAND saves mum – Angela Wileman – John Hemming MP – Radio Europe Interview – Part 2

ANGELA WILEMAN & SONS FLEE SOCIAL SERVICES, FINDING SANCTUARY IN IRELAND

Ask Richard #4

Test Trial 4 Justice

Sack your Social Worker!

Fathers Benefit scam in Closed Court.

I get so upset when I read about:CARE or SUPPORT.

I just happened to hold onto the Autumn 2007 Focus magazine from Leukaemia Care for a good reason. The word “care”also “legacy is meant to create a message or show insight,or even hints at having vision for a commercial charity. which will be likely to be of help or support supposedly for all”people in society.Please note social workers,the MP’s the charities they “all” use it to ask for your help & support.Well let me tell you you there” is no such network available to discuss adopted children or children in care”.
The requests for donations from Leukaemia CARE to leave a legacy to provide vital care and support ,kind of upsets me when I think of adopted children and their families.
Moving on to the chief medical officer I am also disgusted with Liam Donaldson as he took so long to reply. Then notice the “swerve”that most MP’s take when they do not have the facts to be able to give an answer to the question.As some professional families we have met, who have also lost their children in the closed family courts,These professionals still work within the NHS system. They have told us they have looked up the child’s medical health number on the system,to see where they where living post final hearing,and after closed adoption cases looked for more families when their children have been legally kidnapped by the state.

They looked into the NHS & National data -bases and could not find their child in the UK. They were gone,probably abroad to adoption.We are now saying that a global dat-base should be set up,to fly in a stem cell donations or organ donations for adopted children,who are lost in care or adopted.

The corporate parent will not raise this question for a “LOOKED AFTER CHILD”.The child’s appointed court official the “Legal guardian does not include in her or his final report for court. There is also no place on the welfare check list either,for this to be included in the “child’s best Interests either”.So this is the reality of being a state looked after child who is simply warehoused in the care system or shipped out abroad to foreign adoption. These facts and risks that the Government let the courts make decisions with children’s lives, not to mention removing their legal right to find a true genetic key.

this will be when at a time when families will have to del with somebody in their family who are acutely ill. Please note do not wait until you find out the facts,that you are today the number 1 in 3 who has been diagnosed with cancer.

The next likely recipient donor is the parent or half sibling for someone who has been diagnosed with leukaemia.When you are in the final hearing stage,make sure you get this in your position statements for court.Say what you want for the future of your child or children.If it is a wish to leave a true genetic key ,then “GET IT IN THERE NOW”.

WHAT BETTER LEGACY COULD YOU LEAVE WHEN BEING PARTED FROM YOUR CHILD?’

Nobody is saying that all of these public care cases are not justified,children do need to be adopted and looked after when there is good reason to remove a child and place them in a safe environment . The other families who say that there was no justification in a removal of a child in cases of maladministration of evidence presented to the court. These families are saying what about improving the rights for the child scraping a flawed system in an effort to to save the 1 in 3 people who sadly go on to be diagnosed with cancer.
It goes without saying we have all lost confidence in our own MP’s who say they work for us. You only have to look recently at the latest scandal of claiming their expenses.I ask you now what do you think they do when things go wrong for you in closed court?
Why is it taking so long to discuss this issue in the House of Commons the legal right to to find a stem cell donor when you are adopted?

Listen to us the families who have all been through the system.We say the courts & MP’s will destroy your family life ,albeit adopted family and the prospects of the future for your family if left up to the courts.

Every time I have raised this issue on behalf of adopted children it has been stone walled.Is this a case of it is too sensitive a subject to be highlighted or dealt with in a compassionate manner ? I do not think so the only conclusion I can arrive at is this: it is a case of the courts and the Government have been found out for being careless, or could not care at all about how adopted families find help for critically ill children or adult .
Next post how to set up probate or leave an inheritance for a child who has been lost in care or through divorce.

When you have been marginalized out of a child’s life long term and want to leave a legacy.
Where do you begin to trust solicitors or courts ever again?

I would not trust an MP as far as…

From:
Date: 19 December 2007 13:52:20 GMT
To:
Subject: Organ donor and adoption

Dear Ms McDermott
 
As you will be aware your email of 4 September to Mr Donaldson, the Chief Medical Officer, has been passed to this Department for a response.  I am very sorry for the long delay in replying to you.
 
When children are placed for adoption, adoption agencies are required to collect comprehensive medical information about the health of the child, their birth parents and siblings to ensure a full health history is available for them. This information will be sought from birth parents and through their health records.  Sadly however there are times when a serious illness strikes which could not have been foreseen. 
 
Sometimes a birth relative or adopted adult approaches an adoption agency because they want to inform the relative separated through adoption about serious hereditary illnesses, or when a transplant is need. In such cases, it is important for adoption agencies to establish whether the person just wants to pass on this medical information or whether they are also seeking contact with the relative.
 
If the concern is solely to pass on medical information, there is provision for this through the National Health Service Central Register (NHSCR). The NHSCR provides a service to facilitate information being passed on in circumstances where there is a stated medical/health need.  Contact can only be made between the birth relative’s and adopted person’s general practitioners (GPs) or other doctors e.g. consultants.  For further details about this service, the NHSCR Adoption Section should be contacted:
 
NHS Adoption section
PO Box 106
Southport
PR8 2WA
 
Although a birth relative or adopted adult can contact the NHSCR directly, it may be helpful for both parties if the adoption agency is involved.  The adoption counsellor may be able to include a letter with the medical information being sent by the NHSCR, making themselves available to both the GP and the relative, should either wish to discuss any issues arising from the information.
 
There may of course be situations where the adoption agency is in touch with the adoptive family or birth family and, therefore, they would be best placed to pass on any significant medical information rather than involving the NHSCR.
 
If the adopted person or relative cannot be found it is possible that he or she may have died and the NHS registry is the best means of making an up to date check on this. This route will not provide a current location for an adopted person/birth relative but will confirm that the records have been located and the adopted person/birth relative is registered with a GP, that there is no record of a current registration with a GP, or that the adopted person has died.  In the latter case a link is provided to the registration of the death and this information can facilitate appropriate work with the relative.
 
Yours sincerely
 
 
Mrs R Wilson
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Children in Care Division
Adoption Team
 
 
Lynda McDermott                                                            
                                      cc:                                             
                                                 bcc:                                            
                      04/09/2007 11:05           Subject: Organ Donor                            
                                                                                                 
                                                                                                 
 
 
 
Dear Mr Donaldson,
 
I am campaigning for children in care or who sadly have been in a
closed adoption. The reason that I have become involved is firstly my
son developed leukaemia in 2004. My son was made a ward of court  and
our lives were destroyed by the outcome. We no longer get to see my
son I did have one and a half hours in a run down contact centre in
the Luton area however thought this to be more harmful to him long term.
 
Moving on I saw a news paper article and it was a gentleman asking to
find his adoptive family in Luton. If you wish  can send you the
article then I have read about a group of people in America who since
the 1990’s have been fighting for children’s rights to open up their
cases to help them find a stem cell donor for a match .
 
What I am asking from you is that you raise this question in
Parliament on behalf of children who are lost in the care
system ,that if in the future they need to find a relative,that they
can do so. As the law stands at present there is nothing in law
available protecting these issues surrounding private family law.
 
 
I want these children to be able should they need to do so be able to
contact a data base and search for a donor ,At least then this will
give them and even chance of finding a donor . I am appalled at the
present at the current situation for such children ,and also  the
global search of Graham Barnell in Australia who is a British Citizen
them to have a good chance of fighting this disease leukeamia or any
other life threatening disease that may affect them .
 
I want the courts and Parliament to make changes in the law and give
children these rights automatically at a time when in court and
removing the children from birth parents make it mandatory that they
leave genetic  information stored on a data- base for their child’s
future .
 
All these so called expert witness’s training doctors at £180 per
hour to give evidence and who monopolize the system causing chaos
throughout families lives in the UK should have come up with this
idea years ago . By doing something like this in the future that will
drag us up to speed and out of the dark ages or dishing out draconian
and barbaric system that is operating in the secret family courts in
London and up and down the country.
 
I have experienced first hand the corruption of the system and lost
my child he is living with leukaemia and he  will not be able to find
a stem cell from my side of the family simply because of the lies
that have been wrote about us. If you read the files you would
believe of us that we are all dead . This is not so there is an
extended family in the north of England . This is a fact and based on
the true account of the miscarriage of justice that we were left to
deal with. I would appreciate some support for such an important
matter , and that of the real rights of a child to survive the
British Draconian Courts  open the Closed Courts and through out the
Meddow clones whilst you are in the process of making laws that
affect FAMILY life.  In my sons memory you could call it C’s Law.
 
Yours sincerely
 
Linda McDermott
 
64 Bunting Road
Luton
 
Bedfordshire
 
www.adonorforgraham.com